|
Author
|
Topic: pertronix ignitor II reliability
|
mikel3891 Gearhead Posts: 111 From: philippines Registered: Sep 2005
|
posted 01-11-2006 09:05 PM
i have a pertronix ignitor II installed but i seem to find some people in this forum unhappy with the ignitor and some are very satisfied. this made me confused. what can you guys say about the ignitor II?
|
trashline Gearhead Posts: 2230 From: Levittown, Pa Registered: Dec 2003
|
posted 01-12-2006 10:58 AM
ive heard the ignitor 1 more reliable. I ran it in my 66 for a while till i converted to the duraspark ran off my msd 6A box.------------------ 88 thunderbird TC 2.3L Gillis at 18 psi, walbro 255 lph fuel pump, Kirban at 39 psi, 3.73 8.8" rear, rebuilt head, brand new IHI 66 mustang 200ci 3 speed Holley weber two barrel, msd 6A, 3.5 gears, 3.03 v8 three speed trans. 68 Fairlane 289 w/ auto rusting away motor is going in the mustang 79 f150 300 3 onda tree awaiting a new transmission
|
Dreamcometrue Gearhead Posts: 903 From: New-Brunswick,Canada Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 01-12-2006 02:43 PM
Had mine for 2 years now and so far so good. Still thinking about getting another one, just in case..... Rino
|
trashline Gearhead Posts: 2230 From: Levittown, Pa Registered: Dec 2003
|
posted 01-12-2006 03:00 PM
one thing to remember is always keep the points in the glove box b/c you could be driving and the pertronix just give out one day. with either of them------------------ 88 thunderbird TC 2.3L Gillis at 18 psi, walbro 255 lph fuel pump, Kirban at 39 psi, 3.73 8.8" rear, rebuilt head, brand new IHI 66 mustang 200ci 3 speed Holley weber two barrel, msd 6A, 3.5 gears, 3.03 v8 three speed trans. 68 Fairlane 289 w/ auto rusting away motor is going in the mustang 79 f150 300 3 onda tree awaiting a new transmission
|
Bob429 Gearhead Posts: 545 From: Watervliet,MI,USA Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 01-13-2006 05:41 PM
I have used both I and II. Both performed perfectly for me. I have a II in my 429 SCJ. But I do keep a set of points in the glove box. They are easy to switch out in case of failure. I have had better starts since the conversion other than that I have not noticed any increase in performance. My mileage seems to be a little better. ------------------ Bob Member#39 71 J code 429 SCJ-R Sportsroof C6 4:11 14.226@96.82 on street tires http://www.my429scj.50megs.com http://www.mustangsandmore.50megs.com/MembersPics/Bob429.html 2004 Pure stock muscle car Drags pics now on my page. [This message has been edited by Bob429 (edited 01-13-2006).]
|
BornInAFord Gearhead Posts: 610 From: Bend, OR, USA Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 01-17-2006 11:03 PM
I have a "plug and play" dizzy with an Ignitor II for about a year and close to 1000 miles. No problems yet, and I don't expect any. One of the keys seems to be to not leave the key on with the engine off. For the Ignitor I, this has caused the unit to burn out. It is supposed to be corrected for the II. Daniel
|
sodi Gearhead Posts: 286 From: Kenosha Wi. USA Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 01-22-2006 12:06 PM
Would the petronox Ignition cause a car to backfire on hard acceleration or do they just go out ?? Thanks sodi
|