Brought to you in part by:

M&M Restoration & Tool Supply Store

Great deals on auto restoration supplies!

.


NOTICE! The old Mustangsandmore.com is a read-only archive.
Currently the Search function is inoperative, but we are working on the problem.

Please join us at our NEW Mustangsandmore.com forums located at this location.
Please notice this is a brand new message board, and you must re-register to gain access.

  Mustangsandmore Forum Archive
  Ford Racing
  Long rod 302

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Long rod 302
SundanceKid
Gearhead

Posts: 1302
From: UT
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 03-05-2003 03:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SundanceKid        Reply w/Quote
Anyone done one of these? As I understand it, the longer the rod the better the rod ratio the less flow you will need in the heads due to the piston dwell at TDC..yada yada...but in the real world. Is a long rod 302 based engine worth the effort? Just looking for some opinions?

Mpcoluv
Gearhead

Posts: 1421
From: Charlotte NC usa
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 03-05-2003 04:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mpcoluv        Reply w/Quote
A guy wrote several "Long Rod" articles in Hot Rod years ago. The chevy article was an outright lie. As of several months ago, the "Long Rod" motor was never fired up, much less perform as the article stated.
Long rods mean a lot (under 10 hp) to guys trying to squeeze the last bit of HP out of a motor limited by rules.
For a street/strip motor, it is not worth the money. You won't see much gains.

jdsgallops
Gearhead

Posts: 326
From: Naples, FL
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 03-06-2003 12:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jdsgallops        Reply w/Quote
Hang on there, from my research not everything that Mpcoluv said is true. I don't know anything about the chevy engine, but there has been much written about a long rod engine. The 302 is already a long rod engine, with a 1.71 ratio(if I remember correctly). Long rods work best in an engine with limited breathing ability. An engine that breathes well won't see much if any benefit from going to a longer rod. A lond rod engine is also more detonation sensitive because the piston dwells at top dead center longer. This extended dwell time is also part of the advantage though as it pushes the air out longer. The detonation thing wouldn't really be an issue unless running a power adder IMO. Regardless of benefits and draw backs, think about it this way. To build a long rod engine you need new rods and a custom set of pistons. why spend $500 on rods and $5-700 on pistons, when you can buy a complete stroker kit for a small block ford now days for the same price. The longer stroker will give you more power in a more usable power range than any long rod will. Best rule of thumb I have heard on this subject is "use the longest rod available for your intended application. This goes back to stroke, deck height, and desired piston compression height(ie, power adder or N/A). With the price of a stroker kit nowdays, any arguement about rod ratio is really pointless.

stoker
Gearhead

Posts: 159
From: folsom,cal,
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 03-06-2003 08:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for stoker        Reply w/Quote
sundancekid,i have a long rod 302 rotater kit with lots of extras for 450.00.if interested email me kevinkraft4@ATTBI.COM

Moneymaker
Administrator

Posts: 29200
From: Lyons, IL, USA
Registered: May 99

posted 03-06-2003 09:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moneymaker        Reply w/Quote
The only time I ever saw anything with a longer rod SBF was when used with a stroker crank.
I tried some 5.250 stuff years ago with a two ring piston on a bracket 302 and it ran about the same as a similar 302. The cylinder walls did not wear any less.

------------------
Alex Denysenko
Co-Administrator and Moderator

NHRA/IHRA/SRA member and licensed Superstock driver
MCA member# 53321
NHRA and IHRA SS/LA National Record Holder '00,'01,'02,&'03
Fleet of FoMoCo products including 88 ASC McLaren Mustang #28
Professional Manwhore
The Barry of BarrysGrrl

Quote #1: "I never met a magazine mechanic I liked."
Quote #2: "Make sure brain is in gear before engaging mouth!"
Quote #3: "If you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch!"
www.moneymakerracing.com

steve'66
Gearhead

Posts: 9835
From: Sonoma,CA,USA
Registered: Mar 2000

posted 03-06-2003 10:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for steve'66        Reply w/Quote
From David Reher's article in Nat'l Dragster,

Talking to racers and customers, I've realized that drag racing lost almost an entire generation during the '70s and '80s. Many
younger racers didn't climb the same learning curve that people of my generation did. I understand why: When I was a teenager, my friends and I couldn't wait to put a new cam in a '67 Camaro or bolt a set of gears into a SS396 Chevelle. But the effects of several Energy Crises and emission regulations meant that cars became simply transportation appliances when the next generation was growing up. They were more interested in computers and camcorders than camshafts and carburetors. Now that some of the members of this "lost generation" are rekindling an interest in racing, they need the basic information that my generation learned taking apart street cars in our driveways.

We also wanted to point out some of the common myths and misconceptions about high-performance motors. For example, I've seen dozens of magazine articles on supposedly "magic" connecting rod ratios. If you believe these stories, you would think that the ratio of the connecting rod length to the crankshaft stroke is vitally important to performance. Well, in my view, the most important thing about a connecting rod is whether or not the bolts are torqued!

If I had to make a list of the ten most important specifications in a racing engine, connecting rod length would rank about fiftieth. Back in the days when Buddy Morrison and I built dozens of small-block Modified motors, we earnestly believed that an engine needed a 1.9:1 rod/stroke ratio. Today every Pro Stock team uses blocks with super-short deck heights, and we couldn't care less about the rod ratio. A short deck height improves the alignment between the intake manifold runners and the cylinder head intake ports, and helps to stabilize the valvetrain. These are much more important considerations than the rod-to-stroke ratio. There's no magic - a rod's function is to connect the piston to the crankshaft. Period.
*******************************************

That's good enough for me.


SteveW

SundanceKid
Gearhead

Posts: 1302
From: UT
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 03-06-2003 11:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SundanceKid        Reply w/Quote
I didn't specify real, but I ment more towards the street and head flow side of things not full out racing and wear on the bores.
I myself agree that there is no benifit to be had, or if there is it is minor. Does anyone have any opinions on head flow?
Alex would it be legal to run a long rod engine in classes that the heads can't be ported for the nessesary flow needed ect.

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Mustangsandmore Front Page

Copyright 2006, Steve LaRiviere. All Rights Reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47d

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

[Build a free Mustangsandmore.ws Home Page!]

[Posting Pictures]

[About M&M][Members' Pics]

[M&M Conventions] [M&M Mug Shots] [Tech Articles]

[M&M Bookstore] [M&M Restoration & Tool Supply Store]